Updated on Friday, Jan 09 with last week's publisher data.
Customize

Journals

Quarterly Journal of Economics

Changing Opportunity: Sociological Mechanisms Underlying Growing Class Gaps and Shrinking Race Gaps in Economic Mobility

Raj Chetty, Will Dobbie, Benjamin Goldman, Sonya R Porter, Crystal S Yang

Full text
We show that intergenerational mobility changed rapidly by race and class in recent decades in the U.S. and study the causal mechanisms underlying those changes. Between the 1978 and 1992 birth cohorts, earnings increased for white children from high-income families relative to white children from low-income families, increasing earnings gaps by parental income (“class”) by 30%. Earnings increased for Black children at all parental income levels, reducing white-Black earnings gaps for children from low-income families by 30%. Class gaps grew and race gaps shrank similarly for non-monetary outcomes such as educational attainment, standardized test scores, and mortality rates. Using a quasi-experimental design, we show that the divergent trends in economic mobility were caused by differential changes in childhood environments, as proxied by parental employment rates, within local communities defined by race, class, and childhood county. Outcomes improve across birth cohorts for children who grow up in communities with increasing parental employment rates, with larger effects for children who move to such communities at younger ages. Children’s outcomes are most strongly related to the parental employment rates of peers they are more likely to interact with, such as those in their own birth cohort, suggesting that the relationship between children’s outcomes and parental employment rates is mediated by social interaction.

Journal of Political Economy

Generic title: Not a research article

Front Matter

Full text

The Macroeconomic Consequences of Early Childhood Development Policies

Diego Daruich

Full text

Sleep: Educational Impact and Habit Formation

Osea Giuntella, Silvia Saccardo, Sally Sadoff

Full text

The Gas Trap: Outcompeting Coal vs. Renewables

Bard Harstad, Katinka Holtsmark

Full text

Do Mergers and Acquisitions Improve Efficiency? Evidence from Power Plants

Mert Demirer, Omer Karaduman

Full text

Training, Communications Patterns, and Spillovers Inside Organizations

Miguel Espinosa, Christopher Stanton

Full text

The Zero-Beta Interest Rate

Sebastian Di Tella, Benjamin Hébert, Pablo Kurlat, Qitong Wang

Full text

The Origin of the State: Land Productivity or Appropriability? Comment

Nikolai Cook, Thibaut Duprey, Anthony Heyes, Martino Pelli

Full text

Financial Aid and Upward Mobility: Evidence from Colombia's Ser Pilo Paga

Juliana Londono-Velez, Catherine Rodriguez, Fabio Sanchez, Luis Esteban Alvarez-Arango

Full text

A Method to Estimate Discrete Choice Models That Is Robust to Consumer Search

Jason Abaluck, Giovanni Compiani, Fan Zhang

Full text

Journal of Econometrics

Estimation and inference for large-dimensional generalized matrix factor models

Xinbing Kong, Tong Zhang

Full text

Estimation and inference for causal functions with multi-way clustered data

Nan Liu, Yanbo Liu, Yuya Sasaki

Full text

Nonparametric treatment effect identification in school choice

Jiafeng Chen

Full text

Journal of the European Economic Association

Coordination and Sophistication

Larbi Alaoui, Katharina A Janezic, Antonio Penta

Full text
How coordination can be achieved in isolated, one-shot interactions without communication and in the absence of focal points is a long-standing question in game theory. We show that a cost—benefit approach to reasoning in strategic settings delivers sharp theoretical predictions that address this central question. In particular, our model predicts that, for a large class of individual reasoning processes, coordination in some canonical games is more likely to arise when players perceive heterogeneity in their cognitive abilities, rather than homogeneity. In addition, and perhaps contrary to common perception, it is not necessarily the case that being of higher cognitive sophistication is beneficial to the agent. We show that subjects’ behavior in a laboratory experiment is consistent with the predictions of our model, and present evidence against alternative coordination mechanisms.

Coordination and Sophistication

Larbi Alaoui, Katharina A Janezic, Antonio Penta

Full text
How coordination can be achieved in isolated, one-shot interactions without communication and in the absence of focal points is a long-standing question in game theory. We show that a cost-benefit approach to reasoning in strategic settings delivers sharp theoretical predictions that address this central question. In particular, our model predicts that, for a large class of individual reasoning processes, coordination in some canonical games is more likely to arise when players perceive heterogeneity in their cognitive abilities, rather than homogeneity. In addition, and perhaps contrary to common perception, it is not necessarily the case that being of higher cognitive sophistication is beneficial to the agent. We show that subjects’ behavior in a laboratory experiment is consistent with the predictions of our model, and present evidence against alternative coordination mechanisms.

Journal of Labor Economics

Robots and Workers

Daron Acemoglu, Hans Koster, Ceren Ozgen

Full text

Journal of Public Economics

“Not ready” as a productive wake-up call: Do second chances improve human capital investments?

Thorbjørn Sejr Guul, Søren Albeck Nielsen

Full text

The long run effects of a teacher-focused school reform on student outcomes

Sarah R. Cohodes, Ozkan Eren, Orgul Ozturk

Full text

Econometrics Journal

Correction to: Philip G. Wright, directed acyclic graphs, and instrumental variables

Full text

Economic Journal

Qualitative Analysis with Large-N: A New Method with an Application to Aspirations in Bangladesh

Julian Ashwin, Vijayendra Rao, Monica Biradavolu, Aditya Chhabra, Arshia Haque, Afsana Khan, Nandini Krishnan

Full text
The qualitative analysis of open-ended interviews has vast potential in economics but has found limited use. This is partly because the interpretative, nuanced human reading of text and coding that it requires is labour intensive and very time consuming. This paper presents a method to simplify and shorten the coding process by extending a small sample of interpretative human-annotated interviews to a larger, representative, sample using supervised natural language processing. We extensively assess the robustness and reliability of this approach to show when and how it adds value, including an analysis of how many human-annotated documents are optimal for a budget constrained researcher. We apply this approach to analyse 2,200 open-ended interviews on parent’s aspirations for children with Rohingya refugees and their Bangladeshi hosts. We show that studying aspirations with open-ended interviews extends the economics focus on material goals to ideas from philosophy and anthropology that emphasize aspirations for moral and religious values, and the navigational capacity to achieve these aspirations. This approach allows us to identify several novel results including a new type of migrant selection; we show that Rohingya refugees are negatively selected on education but positively selected on navigational capacity.

Institutions under Pressure: The Effect of Community Groups on Forest Preservation after a Natural Disaster

Prakash Pathak, Matthias Schündeln

Full text
We analyse the resilience of community-based institutions to large shocks. Our case study is on forest user groups in Nepal in the aftermath of the 2015 earthquake. We combine remote sensing data with detailed administrative data on forest user groups and exploit spatial variation in the intensity of the earthquake. Using a triple difference strategy, we show that the earthquake-induced increase in deforestation is significantly lower in locations with a higher share of forest covered by forest user groups. Thus, these institutions lead to more sustainable use of forests when they are under pressure. Regarding potential mechanisms, survey data suggest that social capital plays a role for the positive effects of forest user groups. More generally, our findings show that shifting governance of local resources to community-based institutions can be an effective policy in times of increased pressure on natural resources.

Keeping up with the Joneses to Impress the Smiths: Conspicuous Consumption in a Society with Income Segregation

Benedikt Mihm

Full text
I develop a signalling model to study how income segregation impacts conspicuous consumption when neighbourhood income distributions are the reference for social comparisons, but consumers signal to an outside observer. Consumers can have different attitudes to status: conformists have a greater incentive for conspicuous consumption when they have many well-off neighbours, while snobs have a greater incentive when they have few well-off neighbours. Despite the neighbourhood income distribution affecting the incentives of snobs and conformists in starkly different ways, I show that conspicuous consumption is always higher in a more segregated society.